Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
»ç¿ë±â/ÇÊÅ×±â

¾Ö½½·Ð, ¾Ö½½·Ð xp, µà·Ð ¸Þ¸ð¸® °ü·Ã¹ö±× ¸®´ª½º¿¡¼­ Àç¹ß°ß

±èµµ¿Ï (ºñȸ¿ø)

Á¶È¸ : 4549
ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ : 2002/01/23 22:16
°£Æí URL : http://www.bodnara.co.kr/bbs/bbs.html?D=20&num=14802
Æ®À§ÅÍ    ÆäÀ̽ººÏ
Ãâó : www.viahardware.com
¸®´ª½ºÄ¿³Î¿¡¼­ AGP¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ ÆäÀÌ¡ ¹®Á¦°¡ ¹ß°ßµÇ¾ú´Ù°í ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
ÀÌÀü¿¡ AMD¿¡¼­ ¹ßÇ¥ÇÑ À©µµ¿ì 2000¿ë AGP ÆÐÄ¡°¡ Àִµ¥ ±×°ÍÀÌ Áö±ÝÀÇ Çö»ó°ú
°°Àº ¹®Á¦¸¦ ÇØ°áÇϱâ À§ÇØ ¹ßÇ¥µÈ °ÍÀ̶ó°í ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
¸»¿¡´Â ¾à°£ ¸Á°¡Áø(?) ÇÁ·Î¼¼¼­µéÀÌ ±×·±´Ù°í Çϴµ¥ ³¶¼³ÀΰŠ°°±¸...
¹®Á¦ÀÇ ÇÙ½ÉÀº ÀÌ·¸½À´Ï´Ù.
ÆæƼ¾ö ±ÞÀ¸·Î ºÎ»óÇϸ鼭 ÆäÀÌ¡ »çÀÌÁîÀÇ Å©±â°¡ ÀÌÀüÀÇ 4ų·Î¹ÙÀÌÆ®¿¡¼­
4¸Þ°¡¹ÙÀÌÆ®·Î ¿Ã¶ó°£ È®ÀåÆäÀÌ¡¸ðµå°¡ Ãß°¡µÇ¾ú´Âµ¥ ÀÌ ¸ðµå¸¦ À© 2000À̳ª
¸®´ª½º¿¡¼­ »ç¿ëÇÑ´Ù°í ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ¸ðµå´Â AGP¿Í ¹ÐÁ¢ÇÑ °ü·ÃÀÌ ÀÖ¾î ¾ÈÁ¤¼º
¹®Á¦°¡ ¹ß»ýÇÑ´Ù°í Çϴ±º¿©. 2000¿ë AGPÆÐÄ¡´Â 2000ÀÇ ·¹Áö½ºÆ®¸®¸¦ ¼öÁ¤
ÀÌ ±â´ÉÀ» ¹«´ÉÈ­½ÃÄÑ ÀÌÀüÀÇ 4ų·Î¹ÙÀÌÆ® ÆäÀÌ¡À» »ç¿ëÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ¹®Á¦¸¦
ÇØ°áÇϴ°ÍÀε¥ À̹øÀÇ »õ·Î¿î ¸®´ª½ºÄ¿³Î¿¡¼­ °°Àº ¹æ¹ýÀÌ ¾²Àδٰí ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
Âü°íÇϽñæ...


Gentoo Linux has posted a report that claims there is an bug in the Athlon processor family (affecting Athlon, AthlonXP, MP, and Duron) that prevents the chip from using Extended Paging when AGP is also in use.

A quick check of the MS Knowledge Base and the AMD website reveals easy access to a solution but not much data about the cause of the problem.

The article, overall, is useful and I recommend checking it out if you re a Linux user having trouble on an AMD system, but the author makes one comment I find simply absurd:

"Here s something that s even more unsettling -- consider what kind of Linux users actually use AGP. That s right -- desktop users. And in what area has Linux been struggling? Yes, the desktop. One wonders how many negative desktop Linux experiences have resulted from this unfortunate problem."

Probably not too many. In order for the above to be applicable, it would have to be shown that the majority of Linux desktop users are also AMD users.

Furthermore, it ignores some basic facts about the OS market. The reason Linux is struggling on the desktop is because not one OEM offers it as a primary OS. Some DO offer it as a secondary alternative (a positive step) but none of the Top 10 OEM s sell Linux as a primary system.

Furthermore, Linux still has a reputation for being difficult to use. From what I understand, the OS has come a very long way in recent years but it will have to come further still before the mass market will embrace it.

Finally, there is the simple fact that most computer users are barely literate about computers at all. Having learned to operate on OS at the minimal level in which to function they are completely intimidated and unwilling to learn another product.

There is a desktop, enthusiast market for Linux. One day, there may be a desktop non-enthusiast market for it as well. But until the day when Linux overcomes its own reputation as a fringe OS as well as the technical ignorance of the vast majority of computer "users" it will not be a mainstream desktop product.

This is not a defense of a Linux bug--clearly AMD has a problem they need to address--but blaming the low acceptance of Linux on AMD is a rather foolish thing to do--there are much larger causes.


¡¡ 0
¡¡
ÁÁÀº ³»¿ëÀÇ ±ÛÀ̶ó¸é ÃßõÇØÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
·Î±×ÀÎÀ» ÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Æµµ Ãßõ ÇÏ½Ç ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
xxx
ºÒ¹ý ±¤°í±Û ½Å°íÇϱâ
I
   ÀÌ °Ô½Ã¹°ÀÇ ´ñ±Û º¸±â
ÃßõÁ¦¾È³»
ÁÁÀº °Ô½Ã¹°¿¡´Â ÃßõÀ» ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.ÃßõÀÌ 5 ÀÌ»óÀÌ¸é ¸ÞÀÎÆäÀÌÁö Çìµå¶óÀο¡ °Ô½Ã¹°À» °É¾î µå¸³´Ï´Ù.
Àû¸³µÈ Æ÷ÀÎÆ®·Î ÁøÇàÁßÀÎ À̺¥Æ®¿¡ Âü¿©ÇÏ½Ã¾î °æÇ°À» ¹Þ¾Æ°¡½Ç ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

Æ÷ÀÎÆ®¾È³» ±ÛÀÛ¼º : 20Á¡, ÃßõŬ¸¯ : 2Á¡, Ãßõ¹ÞÀº»ç¶÷ 2Á¡, ´ñ±ÛÀÛ¼º : 4Á¡ (2008.12.29ÀϺÎÅÍ)
»ç¿ë±â/ÇÊÅ×±â
223 ´º½ºÅ¬¸³   SiS 645 ±â¹Ý ¸ÞÀκ¸µå º¥Ä¡¸¶Å© Å×½ºÆ®... ±èµµ¿Ï 0 02.02.13 4318
222 ÇʵåÅ×½ºÆ®   [»ç¿ë±â] ÁÖ¸Ó´Ï ¼Ó¿¡ µü Çϳª!! Tzar 2000+ ^.^ ! ¹Ú¿µ´ë 0 02.02.12 5940
221 ÇʵåÅ×½ºÆ®   ºòºö BM-iCOMBO ÀϹÝÇü ³»ÀåÇü Çãºê ÇʵåÅ×½ºÆ® ÀÌ°æ¼ö 0 02.02.10 7042
220 ÇʵåÅ×½ºÆ®   [SL-75DRV4] ¾îÄí½ºÆ½ ¿§Áö¿ÍÀÇ »ç¿ë...^^ 2 ¹ÚÇö¿í 0 02.02.08 6974
219 ´º½ºÅ¬¸³   KT333 ¹®Á¦ ¹ß°ß... ±èµµ¿Ï 0 02.02.07 5223
218 ´º½ºÅ¬¸³   3dfx À¥»çÀÌÆ®°¡ ¹®À» ´Ý½À´Ï´Ù. ±èµµ¿Ï 0 02.02.06 4578
217 ÇʵåÅ×½ºÆ®   [K7A+] °£´Ü »ç¿ë±â (KT133 º¸µå¿Í ºñ±³) - ¼öÁ¤ÇÔ. 3 K7A+ »ç¿ëÀÚ 0 02.02.05 6726
216 ´º½ºÅ¬¸³   XP¿¡¼­ÀÇ safedisc CD °ÔÀÓ ÆÐÄ¡ ±èµµ¿Ï 0 02.02.04 5088
215 ÇʵåÅ×½ºÆ®   ±×·¡ÇÈÄ«µå ¾î¶²°Ô ´õÁÁÀº°¡???? 1 À¯º´ÁÖ 2 02.02.04 6542
214 ´º½ºÅ¬¸³   °ÔÀÓÀ» À§ÇÑ ±×·¡ÇÈÄ«µå 10 ±èµµ¿Ï 0 02.02.02 5122
213 ÇʵåÅ×½ºÆ®   [ÇʵåÅ×½ºÆ®]AOPEN AX4B Pro ±è¿¬Ã¢ 0 02.02.02 5879
212 ´º½ºÅ¬¸³   EPoX BIOS.. ±èµµ¿Ï 0 02.02.02 4815
211 ÇʵåÅ×½ºÆ®   [XP333] IWILL XP333 »ç¿ë±â ( ½ºÆåÆí ) ¹ÚÁ¤¹è 0 02.02.02 6964
210 ´º½ºÅ¬¸³   GeForce 2 Ti ¾¾¸®Áî º¥Ä¡¸¶Å©... ±èµµ¿Ï 0 02.02.02 4249
209 ÇʵåÅ×½ºÆ®   XP333¿ë ¿À¹öŬ·° ·¥ Ãßõ¿ä¸Á ¹è»ç¹«¿¤ 3 02.02.01 6399
208 ÇʵåÅ×½ºÆ®   [XP333] ²®ÁúÀ» ±ý Áغñ´Â µÇ¾ú´Â°¡ 8 ¿°Á¤³² 0 02.02.01 6896
207 ÇʵåÅ×½ºÆ®   [XP333] ȣȯ¼º Å×½ºÆ®¸®½ºÆ® °¨ÀÚ³ª¹« 2 02.01.31 6997
206 ÇʵåÅ×½ºÆ®   [XP333] °£´Ü »ç¿ë±â ÀüÁø¼® 1 02.01.30 6113
205 ´º½ºÅ¬¸³   [re] Geforce2 Pro? GeForce2Ti!!! °­Áø±¸ 0 02.01.30 4161
204 ´º½ºÅ¬¸³   Geforce2 Pro ±èµµ¿Ï 0 02.01.29 4157
203 ´º½ºÅ¬¸³   SiS 645 ¸ÞÀκ¸µå ¸®ºä ±èµµ¿Ï 0 02.01.29 4255
202 ÇʵåÅ×½ºÆ®   [»ç¿ë±â] ô¶Ò´ºÒ»õ¸¦ Ÿ°í Àú Çϴ÷Î...^.^ ! ¹Ú¿µ´ë 0 02.01.27 5696
[1381] 1382 [1383][1384][1385][1386][1387][1388][1389][1390]