|
커뮤니티
|
|
커뮤니티 추천게시물
운영진 선정 | 추천순 | 최근댓글달린순 | 갤러리(포토)
커뮤니티 추천게시물
운영진 선정 | 추천순 | 최근댓글달린순 | 갤러리(포토)
주택연금 신청 서류, 신청 시기, 은행, 절차, 신청 방법, 대출, 신청 자격, 신청하는 곳, 조건, 신청 장소, 계산기, 수령액, 단점, 상속, 사망 시 총정리 
커뮤니티 추천게시물
운영진 선정 | 추천순 | 최근댓글달린순 | 갤러리(포토)
커뮤니티 추천게시물
운영진 선정 | 추천순 | 최근댓글달린순 | 갤러리(포토)
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
탐스하드웨어에 실린 LCD 모니터 평가입니다.
근데 삼성의 LCD모니터는 시험을 못했다고 하는군여.
삼성 프랑스 지부에 문의를 했는데, 운송비가 넘 비싸서 보내주지 못하겠다구 합니다.
글구 개인적인 테스트에는 보내줄 수 없다고 했다는군여... ㅡㅡ;;
탐의 하드웨어는 단지 웹사이트이며 잡지가 아니라고 부정적인 의사를 밝혔다고 합니다.
대신 시험실에서 만든 결과값을 보냈줬다나... ㅡㅡ;;
아래는 그 원문입니당... ㅡㅡ;; 제대로 해석을 했나... ㅡㅡ;;
I d like to digress a little here and make a personal comment. Although everyone knows how important it is to keep up with the latest technological advances, some still haven t quite grasped the concept that the Internet is an independent medium, not to be ignored, let alone disrespected. Samsung is well-known as an important player in the display business. However, its French branch refused to provide us with a monitor for testing purposes (this test was performed in THG France s labs). Samsung s advertising people brushed us off with the following e-mail: "It is impossible to respond positively to all the inquiries we receive. We have a limited supply of test monitors and the transportation costs are very high. The delivery service costs us a fortune... We have calculated the costs... Please don t take it personally, and have a nice day."
In other words, good-bye and don t bother coming back! By the way, the delivery service costs a total equivalent to about $53. We also sent our inquiry two months in advance. We had to send a dozen follow-up inquiries until we were finally given the brush-off... a week before the time limit we had set was up.
We also tried to contact the management of Samsung France, to no avail. Not a single response to our emails. Even the head of production, whose assistant had taken several of our messages, failed to return our calls. In the end, their advertising people gave us the final snub, with the argument that "Tom s Hardware is just a website, not a magazine. The testing monitors are reserved for the press." Apparently, Samsung doesn t consider Internet readers important enough to inform. And Tom s Hardware isn t the first website to suffer from Samsung s policies. Other online magazines have been refused testing equipment on the very same grounds. So that explains why we don t have any Samsung monitor in this comparison.
한번 쭈욱 보시길... 근데 LG는 있군여 ^^*
현대두 LCD 패널을 만드는군여... ㅡㅡ;;
http://www.tomshardware.com/display/02q1/020114/index.html
마지막 비교페이지입니다
http://www.tomshardware.com/display/02q1/020114/lcd-24.html
|
| |
0
|
|
좋은 내용의 글이라면 추천해주세요.
로그인을 하지 않아도 추천 하실 수 있습니다. |
|
|
|
|
|
| 이 게시물의 댓글 보기 |
|
 |
|
| 추천제안내 |
좋은 게시물에는 추천을 할 수 있습니다.추천이 5 이상이면 메인페이지 헤드라인에 게시물을 걸어 드립니다.
적립된 포인트로 진행중인 이벤트에 참여하시어 경품을 받아가실 수 있습니다.
포인트안내 글작성 : 20점, 추천클릭 : 2점, 추천받은사람 2점, 댓글작성 : 4점 (2008.12.29일부터) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
