Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ
|
|
Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ Ãßõ°Ô½Ã¹°
¿î¿µÁø ¼±Á¤ | Ãßõ¼ø | ÃÖ±Ù´ñ±Û´Þ¸°¼ø | °¶·¯¸®(Æ÷Åä)
Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ Ãßõ°Ô½Ã¹°
¿î¿µÁø ¼±Á¤ | Ãßõ¼ø | ÃÖ±Ù´ñ±Û´Þ¸°¼ø | °¶·¯¸®(Æ÷Åä)
Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ Ãßõ°Ô½Ã¹°
¿î¿µÁø ¼±Á¤ | Ãßõ¼ø | ÃÖ±Ù´ñ±Û´Þ¸°¼ø | °¶·¯¸®(Æ÷Åä)
Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ Ãßõ°Ô½Ã¹°
¿î¿µÁø ¼±Á¤ | Ãßõ¼ø | ÃÖ±Ù´ñ±Û´Þ¸°¼ø | °¶·¯¸®(Æ÷Åä)
|
|
|
|
|
Ãâó : http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=8587
Çؼ®ÀÌ Âª¾Æ¼... Èì... Âü°íÇϽñæ...
0 It s already up and running in Nvidia s labs!
ÀÌ¹Ì ½ÃÇèÇغ¸°í ÀÖ´Ù?
1 It wil use DDR - not DDR2 (!) memory because of the lower price of memory and PCB, more stability and availability in high volumes
DDR1 ¹æ½ÄÀ» ¾´´Ù?
2 It will have 256 bit 400 MHz (may be more for ultra) DDR1 memory interface. And there will be cards with 256 MB of memory, m boys
256ºñÆ® 400¸Þ°¡?
3 It will have the same features set and probably near as damnit the same core clock.
4 It will be as twice, and and sometimes a bit more than that, faster in raw shader power for 1.4 and 2.0 pixel shaders whereas the NV30 was not such a strong performer as we wished - so this aspect is pretty tuned up, lads!
5 It shows from 1.5 up to 2.0 thimes performance of NV30 depending on the tasks and the final frequency specs.
NV30¿¡ ºñÇØ 1.5¶Ç´Â 2.0¹è ¼º´É?
6. It will be definitely faster than RADEON 9800 PRO
9800 pro º¸´Ù ºü¸£´Ù?
7. Other side specs like RAMDAC freq are the same as for NV30
NV30°ú ·¥µ¦Å¬·°ÀÌ °°´Ù?
¤Ñ¤Ñ;; Âü°íÇϽñæ...
|
¡¡ |
2 ¡¡ |
|
ÁÁÀº ³»¿ëÀÇ ±ÛÀ̶ó¸é ÃßõÇØÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·Î±×ÀÎÀ» ÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Æµµ Ãßõ ÇÏ½Ç ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. |
|
|
|
|
ÀÌ °Ô½Ã¹°ÀÇ ´ñ±Û º¸±â |
|
|
|
ÃßõÁ¦¾È³» |
ÁÁÀº °Ô½Ã¹°¿¡´Â ÃßõÀ» ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.ÃßõÀÌ 5 ÀÌ»óÀÌ¸é ¸ÞÀÎÆäÀÌÁö Çìµå¶óÀο¡ °Ô½Ã¹°À» °É¾î µå¸³´Ï´Ù.
Àû¸³µÈ Æ÷ÀÎÆ®·Î ÁøÇàÁßÀÎ À̺¥Æ®¿¡ Âü¿©ÇÏ½Ã¾î °æÇ°À» ¹Þ¾Æ°¡½Ç ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
Æ÷ÀÎÆ®¾È³» ±ÛÀÛ¼º : 20Á¡, ÃßõŬ¸¯ : 2Á¡, Ãßõ¹ÞÀº»ç¶÷ 2Á¡, ´ñ±ÛÀÛ¼º : 4Á¡ (2008.12.29ÀϺÎÅÍ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|